What is Amoralism/meaning/concept/elaboration

Amorality is a philosophical current that considers morality lacking a rational and logical foundation. Therefore, this current concludes that the social norms of common happiness are based on stereotypes that disrupt the individual desires that are truly important. Amoralism

Nietzsche was one of the philosophers who reflected on amoralism as an essence that breaks with social conventionalism. This does not mean that the practice of good is not important in this current, but that the evaluation of the action does not lie in being in accordance with a certain norm, but rather with one’s own inner evaluation. Amoralism

Absence of morals

From this perspective, the idea of ​​sanction as punishment for an unjust work disappears. The good or bad essence of an action cannot be realized within the moral parameters structured in some fundamental principles.

The criticism of some authors against amoralism is the disappearance of some norms and criteria – which are an ethical reference – in which society derives from a kind of moral relativism where everything is allowed. This type of chain also has a major weakness: the loss of value. Amoralism

In turn, relativism also derives from subjectivism. That is, while the ethical standard seeks the value of objectivity, on the contrary, amoralism results from personal opinion as the main criterion for action.

Amoralism is the attitude of being beyond good and evil in the context of Nietzsche’s thought . A morality devoid of any norms and based on the ego’s nourishment .

moral subjectivity

Morals are part of this theoretical framework of action that has a practical vocation made up of the moral principles and customs of a person that are also related to the culture of which they belong. Since morality is also marked by culture, everything that is moral in one context may not be in another. In this case, a person can be considered amoral because it is contrary to their own beliefs. Amoralism

In Greek philosophy, the sophists were thinkers who defended the relativism of everything that existed, including the very concept of good. A relativism unmasked in rhetoric. These thinkers found it impossible to determine the existence of a universally valid ethical framework , that is, applicable in any context and time in a certain way.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button